InfoWorld
Lead with Knowledge
HOME/ SITEMAP
SUBJECT INDEXES
ABOUT US
WHITE PAPERS

Learn to secure your PCs from new and unknown hacker attacks.

Free IDC White Paper - Discover Secure File Sharing for the Enterpriseattacks.

SEARCH:  
Home  //  Article
Print Article    Email Article
Window Manager
Brian Livingston
Which way, Windows?

NOW THAT I'VE had time to read the U.S. Court of Appeals' 150-page ruling on Microsoft, some lessons become clear:

No breakup. Microsoft executives focused media attention on the fact that the breakup penalty was remanded to a different judge. But few people seriously thought this breakup would ever be carried out. And, as I wrote on Nov. 22, 1999, it wasn't even a good idea because it would simply replace one monopoly with two: Windows and Office.

No letup. Before the ruling, many expected that the business-friendly court would let up on Microsoft by dismissing most of the case. Instead the judges unanimously agreed that Microsoft had abused monopoly power. More importantly, they said it had barred PC makers and users from removing bundled programs solely "to protect its monopoly, unredeemed by any legitimate justification." This ruling legally impairs the software giant and aids the 100-plus private lawsuits that are under way against it. These plaintiffs qualify for triple damages if any one of them succeeds.

Here's what I believe Windows users can now expect from Microsoft:

No remorse. Flying in the face of the judges' ruling, Microsoft will release Windows XP with even more bundling: an MSN.com-specific browser, instant messaging, Passport, proprietary media players, and so on. This will make Windows bulkier, slower, and more prone to security holes. For example, when Media Player 7 was transplanted into Windows Me, mere data files suddenly became virus carriers (for a fix, see http://iwsun4.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/00/12/11/ 001211oplivingston.xml).

No recourse. It won't be easy for users to undo these growths obscuring their Windows. But I believe Microsoft will pay a price down the road for its bundling. A new judge will determine a new penalty, and Microsoft by that time may look more like a repeat offender than a first-time delinquent.

Some claim that the whole antitrust trial is irrelevant because any penalty will come too late to bring back all the competing products that kilobit the dust. I disagree. This case is pivotal because the computer industry suffers from what economists call the "network effect". Consumers adopt whatever software the greatest number of other people use. The company with the largest market share tends to become a monopoly.

If we want innovation, we need clear rules to counteract this effect. There is hope. Stung by criticism, Microsoft's retreat on its new browser "smart tags" shows that some limits on absolute power are a good thing.

To restore competition, the new judge should forget about breakups and require Microsoft to license its source code for a set fee. And with numerous companies selling compatible versions, we might finally see a leaner and more stable Windows.




RELATED SUBJECTS

Operating Systems

MORE >
SUBSCRIBE TO:    E-mail Newsletters  InfoWorld Mobile InfoWorld Magazine
Home  //  Article Print Article    Email Article
Back to Top
 ADVERTISEMENT
 

SPONSORED LINKS

Gateway: Your Reliable IT Provider of Business Technology Solutions
Learn to secure your PCs from new and unknown hacker attacks.
Get FREE Hurwitz Report: Control Your App Dev Costs with TogetherSoft!
Click here to receive a FREE Success Kit from Oracle.
SPEED, PERSONALIZATION AND INTEGRATION: THE KEY TO E-COMMERCE SUCCESS.

SUBSCRIBE
E-mail Newsletters
InfoWorld Mobile
Print Magazine

Web-based training
ABOUT INFOWORLD  |  SITE MAP  |  EMPLOYMENT  |  PRIVACY  |   CONTACT US

Copyright 2001 InfoWorld Media Group, Inc.